Recent Posts

91

General Discussion / Re: DRI updates?

« Last post by Chris Nelson on November 15, 2019, 08:51:45 AM »

Barrelers and Hoopers have had a longstanding error in the coding that no one was aware of.

It's also why Barrelers and Hoopers now show the Veteran and Skilled designations, same issue.

Basically before the fix, the DRI was being calculated for the incorrect height.

We decided instead of 'fixing' all the old DRI's which would drop them down lower, we would just leave the old ones as is, and have the corrected numbers for everything going forward

92

General Discussion / DRI updates?

« Last post by Lindsey Cooper on November 15, 2019, 08:12:52 AM »

Have the YPS to get a 100 DRI changed in the past few months?

In July I had a dog run barrelers in 6.05 YPS and he earned a 105.22 DRI.
Oct 26th the same dog ran barrelers in 6.17 YPS and earned a 86.29 DRI.
Last weekend the same dog ran barrelers in 6.8 YPS and earned a 95.10 DRI.

I don't recall seeing a post about it changing, but it's possible I may have missed it.

Thanks!
Lindsey

93

General Discussion / Re: Amanda and Jimmy’s response times

« Last post by Janice_Shavor on November 15, 2019, 07:39:50 AM »

Take care.  Remodels are, at best, stressful. 

94

General Discussion / Re: swap runs ?

« Last post by Chris Nelson on November 15, 2019, 07:08:06 AM »

Guys,

I'm not in much of a conversational mood, so we'll just cut to the chase here.

Swap was ONLY brought around because people wanted more opportunities to run Chances.   That's it.   It gave people 4 rounds instead of 3.

With the new class offerings you could offer 2 rounds of Chances every single day, that's 6 rounds over a 3 day trial.   

There is no reason to have swap when that is an option.     

Anyone who has already submitted trial applications or Premiums with Swap can keep them.   You just can't offer it on any new applications going forward

95

General Discussion / Re: All Around NATCH option question

« Last post by Chris Nelson on November 15, 2019, 07:05:35 AM »

Eventually, yes it will work like that.

I expected folks to take a bit longer to get that many points so I wasn't rushing on the code side of things, but people are getting there a bit quicker than I planned.  So we'll have to get that working here soon

96

General Discussion / Re: "Class Listings"?

« Last post by dogrsqr on November 14, 2019, 04:53:29 PM »

Yeah I was wondering if judges are going to be more choosy about assignments  and format since they now have to design their own courses.  I guess if they have assignments in different regions with same size rings they can re-use courses.  I'm hoping it's not going to be tougher to get judges.

I'm also guessing they aren't leaving the choice up to clubs to offer 8 runs, not double run, because NADAC is the one who gets an earful when trials run long.

Gina Pizzo

97

General Discussion / Re: Amanda and Jimmy’s response times

« Last post by Linda W. Anderson on November 14, 2019, 04:16:00 PM »

Feel better soon!!
Linda

98

General Discussion / Amanda and Jimmy’s response times

« Last post by Amanda Nelson on November 14, 2019, 02:32:17 PM »

Hi everyone!
    I wanted to give a heads up that Jimmy and I are a little behind as I am currently sick and we are putting finishing touches on the remodel for our house. I’m hoping to be caught up over the weekend if all goes well! (And the DayQuil kicks in!)

Thanks!
Amanda and Jimmy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

99

General Discussion / All Around NATCH option question

« Last post by Linda W. Anderson on November 13, 2019, 03:55:40 PM »

As of right now, one can earn an All Around NATCH in 2 ways - with the required number of points in Hoopers and Barrelers OR the required number of points in Gamblers.  My question is this - if you have earned an All Around NATCH in either of these options and then earn enough points in the other option, is that All Around NATCH 2?
Linda

100

General Discussion / Re: "Class Listings"?

« Last post by Kyle on November 13, 2019, 07:06:02 AM »

Many, many thanks to Marcy and Dave for their excellent explanations! Very interesting stuff. Now I know the "what" I will be interested to hear the "why", probably when the video comes out. 

Thanks again!!

-Kyle