Author Topic: Historical Question  (Read 943 times)

Janice_Shavor

  • 2016 Online Seminar Group
  • *****
  • Posts: 467
Historical Question
« on: October 28, 2017, 01:32:21 PM »
When did NADAC go to slat-less contacts?

Just curious.
Janice Shavor
Bella, Buddy, Walker & the shadow

Chris Nelson

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2017, 07:19:40 PM »
Inception :)

Sharon or Becky can correct me if Iím wrong,  but slats on contacts was one of the many reasons nadac was formed.   Because the other venues wouldnít remove them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Janice_Shavor

  • 2016 Online Seminar Group
  • *****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2017, 08:10:02 AM »
We, the North Alabama Canine Cruisers, started hosting NADAC trials in 2006 (?).  At that time we could still use contacts legal in other venues (they had slats).
Janice Shavor
Bella, Buddy, Walker & the shadow

Chris Nelson

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2017, 09:55:54 AM »
Hey Janice,

Iíll have to ask Sharon.   That really doesnít compute with my memory


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lin Battaglia

  • Trial Secretary
  • *****
  • Posts: 193
    • mdt/Agility Ability LLC
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2017, 10:03:17 AM »
I don't ever remember slats at Cataldo. So maybe inception ? 

Richard Wolfe

  • 2016 Online Seminar Group
  • *****
  • Posts: 385
  • The line is not your friend, do not hug the line!!
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2017, 11:55:12 AM »
I started NADAC in 2002.  Definitely no slats allowed then.
Richard Wolfe
Sparkle, Rowdy, Rumor and Raven

dogrsqr

  • Trial Secretary
  • *****
  • Posts: 230
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2017, 03:36:24 PM »
Slats were allowed early on, but I can't remember when they went away.  I started in 1996.

Gina
Gina Pizzo
Abbey, Trek and Shay

Lois Mierau

  • 2016 Online Seminar Group
  • *****
  • Posts: 35
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2017, 03:59:16 PM »
There were slats and then we went to no slats and just painted/sand and then we went to rubber but I don't remember what year.

Lois Mierau
Sondog Agility
Lois Mierau
Sondog Agility
Saskatoon, Sk.
Canada

Chris Nelson

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2017, 04:14:57 PM »
According to Sharon she is pretty sure we stopped allowing slats in 1996


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Billie Rosen

  • 2016 Online Seminar Group
  • *****
  • Posts: 98
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2017, 12:54:37 PM »
Sharon was against slats from the inception of NADAC, and I think there were no slats on the dog walk from early on.  But with the A-frame, there was a period of time where we had 3 slats near the top which supposedly helped small dogs who couldn't get all the way up the A-frame without them.  Then those were removed when NADAC went to the rubberized contacts, I believe.
Billie Rosen    agilek9s@q.com
Kruz'n (Border Terrier)  NATCH 28, Vers. NATCH 14
Klev'r (Border Terrier)  NATCH 11, Vers. NATCH 9
Book'n (Border Terrier)  working on 1st NATCH

Roger Coor

  • *****
  • Posts: 157
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2017, 03:29:08 PM »
  The slats were gone years before the rubberized surface. From what I remember with a conversation with Sharon, she said originally they put a few slats on contacts and other venues followed, then she realized that if the surface was slippery enough that dogs needed slats going up, dogs jammed toes coming down, so they were removed.  The other venues kept the slats. You may notice that the other venue slats have diminished in size to the point that they are just token now.  The slatless contacts were in place when I started NADAC in 1997/1998, but the surface was still paint and sand.  So I am thinking it was either at inception or soon there after.  The rubberized surface came in somewhere around 2005.

Mark Gwillim

  • Judge
  • *****
  • Posts: 153
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2017, 04:56:24 PM »
I was going to say the mid 90s, not sure of the the year. Just going by memories of what dog I was runing
Mark

Sharon Nelson

  • Mother NADAC
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6054
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2017, 10:09:35 PM »
Sharon was against slats from the inception of NADAC, and I think there were no slats on the dog walk from early on.  But with the A-frame, there was a period of time where we had 3 slats near the top which supposedly helped small dogs who couldn't get all the way up the A-frame without them.  Then those were removed when NADAC went to the rubberized contacts, I believe.

You are exactly correct, Billie!  No slats on teeter or dog walk, 3 slats on the top of the a-frame to begin with.

Sharon
Sharon
In-Sync-Agility

Maureen deHaan

  • Trial Secretary
  • *****
  • Posts: 367
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2017, 02:42:10 AM »
I have been competing in NADAC since 1998 and I clearly remember and have photos of my dogs on equipment at trials that had slats well into the early 2000
Maureen, Nika, Kiva & Zoe
Play~Bow
Kingston, NY

"A great dog is not determined by its papers"

dogrsqr

  • Trial Secretary
  • *****
  • Posts: 230
Re: Historical Question
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2017, 08:22:52 AM »
I found this Clean Run article which stated which states that by August 1 2004 they would require the A-frame to be slatless.  I do think there was a period, as usual, where slatless equipment was preferred but not required, and I think the dogwalk was first and A-frame last?  I remember when we came back from trialing other places people would ask me if they had a slatless A-frame and I would typically say "I don't know, I didn't really notice".

https://www.cleanrun.com/index.cfm/feature/213/history-of-agility-part-3.htm

Gina
Gina Pizzo
Abbey, Trek and Shay